Legal Opinion

Irizarry v. Diep Chu

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 2, 2001No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendants’ motion for sum*948mary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff commenced this action individually and on behalf of her infant son, alleging that her son had been exposed to lead paint while residing in property owned by defendants. Although defendants alleged in support of their motion that they had no actual or constructive notice of the hazardous condition, they admit that they received notice of the condition from the Monroe County Department of Health in September 1994. Further, defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Walker v. DiPaoloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alexander v. Westminster Presbyterian ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API