Legal Opinion

Aetna Life & Casualty v. City of New York

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 18, 1982PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William D. Friedmann, J.

Separate trials in these unrelated motor vehicle property damage proceedings, puts in focus the adequacy of proof of “construction” needed as an exception to the preclusionary prior written notice requirements of the “Pothole Law” (Administrative Code of City of New York, § 394a-1.0, subd d, par 2).

THE CONTENTIONS

Following plaintiff’s proof in each proceeding, the defendant moved for a trial order of dismissal (CPLR 4401), upon the failure to plead and prove compliance with section 394a-1.0 (subd d, par 2) of the Administrative Code. Plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Doremus v. Incorporated Village of LynbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Blake v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Schwartz v. TurkenNew York Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zucker v. CapitelliDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  2. Calceano v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API