Legal Opinion

Jones v. Plotkin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 2, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

This is an action of tort for damages to the plaintiff’s automobile resulting from a collision. It was tried with four cross actions, two of which were for personal injuries, one for medical expenses and one for damages to the defendant’s motor vehicle caused by the same collision. The jury returned verdicts for the defendant Jones in the cross actions and for the plaintiff in this action. The defendant herein excepted to the denial of his motion for a directed verdict based solely on the ground that as matter of law the plaintiff’s negligence was a contributing cause of the accident. He…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Loyle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Sutherland v. CarusoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. C. E. Fay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API