People v. Scott
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Hurlbutt, J.
The issue presented on this appeal is whether Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant to suppress statements that he made to a hostage negotiator because he was not given Miranda warnings before making those statements. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the judgment convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the first degree (Penal Law § 120.10 [3]) should be affirmed.
On November 5, 1996 and November 22, 1996, defendant was involved in incidents during which he shot and injured three males and one female,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. PaganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. SpinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BowerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. LubranoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. SwobodaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.