Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Quinzel
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided November 15, 1896PublishedCited by 3 opinions
On appeal from a decree in Schmidt et ux. v. Quinzel, advised by Frederic Adams, advisory master.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
The following circumstances may be assumed in this case: That Christopher August Schmidt and Elizabeth, his wife, were the owners of premises No. 191 Magazine street, in the city of Newark; that Mr. Schmidt, with his wife’s assent, authorized Hildebrandt, an auctioneer, to sell the premises at auction, and that on July 24th, 1895, the auctioneer accordingly sold the *793■same to Charles Quinzel; that on July 25th, 1895, the auctioneer and Quinzel met in a lawyer’s office and signed a writing, of which the following is a copy:
“ Received at Newark,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jones v. CrowleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stretch v. WatsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Buckley v. Mayor, C., of Jersey CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Mosley v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941