Wait v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Keokuk District Court. — Hon. D. Ryan, Judge. Action to recover under the statute double the value of two colts killed by a train operated upon defendant’s railroad, at a place where it had a right to • fence its track. There was a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff:. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
i. RAir.KOADs: on track: neg-closing gate: jury. I. The evidence presented in the abstract shows that the plaintiff’s colts, killed by defendant’s train, escaped and went upon defendant’s railroad track. There is evidence tending to show that they passed through a gate in the rauroad fence, which appears to have been open at the time, and that it had been open for about thirty-six hours before the accident, which occurred early in the morning, or latter part of the night. The testimony also tends to show that the gate was not known to be closed for several days prior to the accident, and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Aylesworth v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1870
- Perry v. Dubuque Southwestern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Bell v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Davis v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- Nicholson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Wirstlin v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Box v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894
- Stoeber v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1918