Kitchen v. Carter
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. References: Lewis v. Flint & P. M. R. Co., 19 N., W. Rep. [Mich.], 744; Jucker v. Chicago d'N. W. R. Co., 52 Wis., 150; Pennsylvania Co. v. Hensil, 70 Ind., 569; Larson v. St. Paul d D. R. Co., 45 N. W. Rep. [Minn.], 1096; Whitman v. Wisconsin d M. R. Co., 17 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 124; Pease v. Chicago d N. W. R. Co., 20 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 908; Fowler v. Chicago d N. W. R. Co., 21 N. W. Rep. [Wis.],…
Read the full summary
Error from the district court of Douglas county. Tried below before Doane, J. References: Lewis v. Flint & P. M. R. Co., 19 N., W. Rep. [Mich.], 744; Jucker v. Chicago d'N. W. R. Co., 52 Wis., 150; Pennsylvania Co. v. Hensil, 70 Ind., 569; Larson v. St. Paul d D. R. Co., 45 N. W. Rep. [Minn.], 1096; Whitman v. Wisconsin d M. R. Co., 17 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 124; Pease v. Chicago d N. W. R. Co., 20 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 908; Fowler v. Chicago d N. W. R. Co., 21 N. W. Rep. [Wis.], 40; Bernso v. Gaston Gas Coal Co.,. 27 W. Va., 285; Childrey v. City of Huntington,, 12 S. E. Rep. [W. Va.], 536; Marvin…
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiff in error, during the year 1886 and prior and subsequent thereto, was a part owner and had control of the premises known as the “Paxton Hotel property” in the city of Omaha. In 1886 the southwest portion of the building was what was called an “annex” to the main body of the building and this annex was fifty feet long, twenty-two feet wide, and two stories high. During the year stated the plaintiff caused an additional or third story to be built upon the annex. For this third story there were no plans and specifications made and no architect was employed to superintend its…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
- Long v. Crystal Refrigerator Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- Wagner v. Watson Bros. Transfer Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Wax v. Co-Operative Refinery Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Merkouras v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.