Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Arnett

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 25, 1948No. 34,615Published

1Opinion of the Court

Magney, Justice.

This is an action in partition. Appeal is from the interlocutory judgment and the judgment confirming sale and directing application of proceeds of sale, insofar only as the same determine the ownership of the real estate involved and the proportions in which, and persons to whom, the proceeds of sale shall he distributed by the referees.

1-2-3. George Arnett, a resident of Illinois, his wife joining, on November 9, 1907, executed a deed conveying a half section farm in Eock county to his son Floyd. The controlling clause in the deed reads:

“* * * to their son Floyd H. Arnett of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norman v. HortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. State ex rel. Tozer v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  3. Mowry v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API