Legal Opinion

Chris v. Bruce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 19, 1980No. 7921SC472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendants argue that the trial court denied them their due process and other constitutional rights by proceeding with the trial in their absence. Essentially, defendants argue that because they and their counsel live two hundred miles away from the site of the trial, “common courtesy and decency” required that plaintiff’s counsel notify them after the calendar call that the case had been moved to first on the calendar, and that the trial court abused his discretion by proceeding to trial without making any attempt to determine their whereabouts.

We agree with defendants that,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pepper v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. City of Durham v. KeenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Seafare Corp. v. Trenor Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. CAROLINA FOREST ASS'N, INC. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. Templeton Oldsmobile-Cadillac-Pontiac, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Hensgen v. HensgenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. CAROLINA FOREST ASS'N, INC. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API