Budracco v. National Surety Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of Brooklyn, fifth district, in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $1,106.25.
1Opinion of the CourtKelby, J.
The action is brought against the defendant as surety in an undertaking on replevin. The undertaking in suit was made and filed in a replevin action brought by one Samuel J. Budracco (the husband of the present plaintiff) against the said Clotilde Rice Budracco and a co-defendant in the replevin action named Cora M. Rice. The replevin action was brought to recover certain household chattels which the plaintiff in replevin alleged were wrongfully detained by the two defendants in the replevin action. The allegations in the complaint in replevin were commingled and connected statements of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morris v. . MorangeNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
- Smith v. WhitingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Mills v. GleasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Manning v. ManningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
- Bown v. WeppnerNew York Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crosswhite v. American Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- H. T. C. Hotel Corp. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929