Legal Opinion

Kania v. Fordham

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 10, 1983No. 82-1391PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to consider once again the constitutionality of the mandatory student fees imposed by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Specifically, the appellants, Richard and Jay Kania and Michael Morris, brought this action against officials of the University asserting that the partial funding of the University’s student newspaper by the student fees compels them to advocate views with which they disagree, in violation of the fourteenth amendment.1 We rejected this identical contention, raised by different plaintiffs, in Arrington v. Taylor, 380…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. First Nat. Bank of Boston v. BellottiSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. SouthworthSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Hyundai Merchant Marine Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Hays County Guardian v. Jerome K. SuppleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Cassidy v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. McFadyen v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API