Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Larry D. Horton v. DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas, L.L.C. F/K/A Mercedes-Benz Financial and Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided September 5, 2008No. 06-07-00141-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by Chief Justice MORRISS.

Ail seem to concede that the debt Larry D. Horton owed to DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas, L.L.C., f/k/a Mercedes-Benz Financial and Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc. (Daimler) had been settled in 2003 through Daimler’s agent, Commercial Recovery Systems, Inc. (Commercial). Horton believed that settlement included an obligation of Daimler and Commercial to remove from his credit report any adverse information about the Daimler debt. When Horton applied in 2005 to purchase a house and a commercial truck, he discovered his credit report still…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Science Spectrum, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rhone-Poulenc, Inc. v. SteelTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gerardo Lujan v. Alorica, Individually and D/B/A Alorica, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  2. Torain v. Clear Channel Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. Horton v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER FIN. SERV. AMERI., LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2008
  4. Riddle v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  5. Claude E. Welch v. Jeremy Crew, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API