Rabanco Ltd. v. King County

*796¶1 — Rabanco appeals from summary judgment dismissing its claim that RCW 36.58.040 requires King County to enter into interlocal agreements before the county can designate a disposal site for waste collected entirely within the borders of King County. RCW 36.58.040 requires counties to enter into interlocal agreements for disposal of waste when the geographic area in which waste collection is authorized lies in more than one county—not when the private hauler merely has authority to collect waste in more than one county. The waste at issue was collected in a geographic area wholly contained…