Legal Opinion
The C. S. Holmes
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided February 15, 1914No. 2539Published
In Admiralty. Suit by Gust Pondahn against the schooner C. S. Holmes. On exceptions to amended libel.
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
This is an action in rem in which libel-ant seeks recovery of damages for personal injuries, damages for negligence in furnishing medical treatment, expenses of medical treatment, and wages. The matter was heretofore considered by the court upon exceptions to the libel, which were sustained, 209 Fed. 970. An amended libel has been filed, and the matter is 'now before the court on the claimant’s exceptions to the amended libel.
The amended libel, after alleging the employment of libelant as a seaman on board the C. S. Holmes, recites:
“That while on the return voyage and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Workman v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- The City of AlexandriaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.