Cole v. Cole
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On demurrer to bill.
1Opinion of the Court
Mache, Chancellob.
The primary object of the bill demurred to is the partition of land in this state, or a sale if division cannot be made.
By the statements of the bill the land of which partition is sought descended to complainant and his brother, Henry Y. Cole, as the only heirs-at-law of their mother, Elizabeth Cole, who died in 1884, seized thereof and intestate, leaving her hus*4band, Enos Cole, surviving her. Thereafter, Henry Y. Cole conveyed his interest in the land to Enos Cole, who was the tenant by the courtesy, and Enos Cole thereafter conveyed the same interest to Jennie A. Cole.…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Lohmann v. LohmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Stroh v. CasnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
- Creech v. McVaughNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Robertson v. BiernackaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Mangan v. ManganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956