Legal Opinion

Cole v. Cole

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 7, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Mache, Chancellob.

The primary object of the bill demurred to is the partition of land in this state, or a sale if division cannot be made.

By the statements of the bill the land of which partition is sought descended to complainant and his brother, Henry Y. Cole, as the only heirs-at-law of their mother, Elizabeth Cole, who died in 1884, seized thereof and intestate, leaving her hus*4band, Enos Cole, surviving her. Thereafter, Henry Y. Cole conveyed his interest in the land to Enos Cole, who was the tenant by the courtesy, and Enos Cole thereafter conveyed the same interest to Jennie A. Cole.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lohmann v. LohmannNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. Stroh v. CasnerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  3. Creech v. McVaughNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. Robertson v. BiernackaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. Mangan v. ManganNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API