Legal Opinion

The Jupiter Corporation v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 8, 1966No. 15396_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

A proceeding is pending before the Federal Power Commission designated Docket No. AR61-2 et al., Area Rate Proceeding (Southern Louisiana Area). This proceeding was instituted on May 10, 1961 (25 FPC 942) to establish just and reasonable rates for all natural gas produced on-shore in Louisiana south of the 31st degree parallel, and off-shore thereof, and sold in interstate commerce for resale.

Petitioner Jupiter, which owns and operates a comparatively small under-water natural gas pipeline system, off-shore Vermillion Parish, Louisiana, within the “South Louisiana Area”,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division v. Federal Power Commission, American Louisiana Pipe Line Company and Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, Intervenors. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company v. Federal Power Commission, American Louisiana Pipe Line Company and Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  2. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jupiter Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  2. The Jupiter Corporation v. Federal Power Commission, Phillips Petroleum Co. And Kerr-Mcgeecorp., Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., Long Island Lighting Co., Intervenors. Union Oil Company of California v. Federal Power Commission, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., the Jupitercorporation, Phillips Petroleum Co., and Kerr McGee Corp., Long Island Lightingco., Intervenors. The Jupiter Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API