The People v. Urselina King
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentRivera, J.
I agree with the majority that defendant’s third-party culpability claim is without merit. However, I would reverse the Appellate Division on the grounds that the jury selection process employed by the judge violated the defendant’s right to a trial by jury, and defendant was denied a fair trial due to her defense counsel’s failure to object to the prosecution’s inflammatory, irrevelant, and prejudicial gender-based summation comments. Therefore, I dissent.
I. Improper Delegation of a Judicial Function
Defendant challenges the trial judge’s jury selection procedure of permitting prospective…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.