Legal Opinion

Electronic Privacy Information Center v. National Security Agency

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 8, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2010-0196PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERYL A. HOWELL, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is the plaintiffs Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Pl.’s Mot.”), ECF No. 44. The plaintiff, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (“EPIC”), seeks attorneys’ fees as a prevailing party pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”). 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(E). The defendant, the National Security Agency (“NSA”), chai- lenges the plaintiffs entitlement to attorneys’ fees and, in the alternative, challenges the reasonableness of the amount requested by the plaintiff, seeking a reduction in fees as…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Fox v. ViceSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Oversight v. U.S. Dep't of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  2. Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Gatore v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  4. Montgomery v. Internal Revenue Serv.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Berryhill v. Bonneville Power AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API