Legal Opinion

Auto Sales Co. v. Yost

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1922PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge:

The controversy involves the right and title of plaintiff, the seller, to a second haiid automobile, sold and delivered by him to one Smalley in Marshall County, by contract in writing reserving title until all purchase money should be paid, and duly recorded in that county where the purchaser then resided and where the machine was then located, as against the impleaded defendant, who purchased the machine from Smalley in Wetzel County within a few days after its removal by him into that county, and within the three months given the seller by the statute to record such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pulaski Mule Co. v. Haley & KoonceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Hammels v. SentousCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hughes v. PledgeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1829
  4. Hundley v. CallowayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Lucado v. Tutwiler's adm'xSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hall v. GrovesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ashland Finance Co. v. DudleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Taylor Bros. Co. v. DudenUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Jackson v. ParkerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Richardson v. Lumbermen's InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API