Legal Opinion

United States v. Atkins

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 2, 1987No. SS 87 Cr. 246 (EW)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.

Defendants Charles Agee Atkins (“Atkins”), William S. Hack (“Hack”) and Ernest M. Grunebaum (“Grunebaum”) move pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2) to dismiss the indictment, containing conspiracy and substantive counts, on the ground that no prosecutable offenses are alleged.

Count 1, the conspiracy count, charges that the defendants, as well as persons known and unknown, combined and conspired to defraud the United States of America and the Internal Revenue Service in the ascertainment, assessment and collection of taxes due the Government. 1 Counts 2…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Charles Agee Atkins and William S. HackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API