United States v. Atkins
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Defendants Charles Agee Atkins (“Atkins”), William S. Hack (“Hack”) and Ernest M. Grunebaum (“Grunebaum”) move pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2) to dismiss the indictment, containing conspiracy and substantive counts, on the ground that no prosecutable offenses are alleged.
Count 1, the conspiracy count, charges that the defendants, as well as persons known and unknown, combined and conspired to defraud the United States of America and the Internal Revenue Service in the ascertainment, assessment and collection of taxes due the Government. 1 Counts 2…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Charles Agee Atkins and William S. HackCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989