Eckles v. Lounsberry
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtGarfield, C. J.
Plaintiffs and intervenors, collateral heirs of William E. Hawks, deceased, claim the principal bequest in his probated will is invalid. Following trial the district court held the will created a valid charitable trust. We affirm the decision.
After the usual provision for payment of debts and expenses the will, in paragraph 2, directs that if “any person should appear with legal proof that he or she is a brother or sister of William E. Hawks, said person be paid five dollars * * # »
Paragraph 3 of the will, the part in controversy, provides: “ ‘I hereby give, devise and bequeath all of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jensen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Wilson v. First National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Valley Savings Bank v. Penn CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- In Re Estate of PierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Moran v. MoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In Re Estate of KielSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Sioux City v. Staab's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- In Re Ditz's EstateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Jones v. GrantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Palmer v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.