People ex rel. Poole v. Hesterberg
New York Supreme Court
Heabixg of the issue raised by a traverse of a return to the writ of habeas corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
Gayxob, J.:
The question presented is whether the magistrate had jurisdiction to issne the warrant. That depends on whether the information or complaint stated facts sufficient to show that a crime had been committed. It is that the relators “ did unlawfully engage in a game commonly called base ball on Sunday, April 24th, 1904 ”, in the borough of Brooklyn. There is no allegation nor any statement of facts therein showing that “ the repose and religious liberty of the community were interrupted ” by them, to use the words of the Sunday statute.
The question therefore is whether playing a game…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- People ex rel. Bedell v. De MottNew York Supreme Court · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- Chadwick Park Athletic Club v. PeasleyNew York Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. FinkelsteinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
- Southern Tier Baseball Ass'n v. Day, New York County Courts1910