Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Poole v. Hesterberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Heabixg of the issue raised by a traverse of a return to the writ of habeas corpus.

1Opinion of the Court

Gayxob, J.:

The question presented is whether the magistrate had jurisdiction to issne the warrant. That depends on whether the information or complaint stated facts sufficient to show that a crime had been committed. It is that the relators “ did unlawfully engage in a game commonly called base ball on Sunday, April 24th, 1904 ”, in the borough of Brooklyn. There is no allegation nor any statement of facts therein showing that “ the repose and religious liberty of the community were interrupted ” by them, to use the words of the Sunday statute.

The question therefore is whether playing a game…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. . MosesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. People ex rel. Bedell v. De MottNew York Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chadwick Park Athletic Club v. PeasleyNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. FinkelsteinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1963
  3. Southern Tier Baseball Ass'n v. Day, New York County Courts1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API