Legal Opinion

Farrell, to Use v. H. Platt Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1940No. Appeals, 204 and 205PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cunningham, J.,

Opinion by

On March 12, 1936, the City of Farrell entered into a contract with H. Platt Company, appellant at No. 204 April Term, 1940, and hereinafter referred to as Platt, for the construction of a Sewage Treatment Plant and Raw Sewage Pump Station — including, inter alia, the construction of six buildings and the laying of sewers .along Spearman Avenue and other city streets. Seaboard Surety Company, appellant at No. 205, became the surety upon Platt’s performance and “labor and materialmen’s bond.”

The “Contractor’s Bidding Sheet” attached to the contract contained more than…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Easton v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Robert Grace Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1920
  3. Worden v. ConnellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  4. A. R. Young Const. Co. v. Road Improvement Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stardust Inn, Inc. v. Doshi (In Re Stardust Inn, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Tudesco Et Ux. v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. Ritz v. Music, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Appeal of GentileFayette County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API