First National Bank v. Hendrickson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action for claim and delivery in tbe district court for Hubbard county, in wbicb Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co., intervened, and under a mortgage from one Jarvis and defendant as copartners claimed to be owner of 500 bushels of wheat taken by plaintiff.
Read the full summary
Action for claim and delivery in tbe district court for Hubbard county, in wbicb Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co., intervened, and under a mortgage from one Jarvis and defendant as copartners claimed to be owner of 500 bushels of wheat taken by plaintiff. At tbe trial, tbe court, Holland, J., directed a verdict that defendant was entitled to recover 322 bushels, and assessing her damages, in case a recovery could not be bad, at $159.34, and that tbe intervenor was entitled to recover 312 bushels, and assessing its damages, in case a recovery could not be bad, at $151.26. From an order denying a…
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This was an action in claim and delivery, tbe property in dispute being about 600 bushels of wheat. Tbe complaint was in tbe usual form, plaintiff corporation alleging generally its ownership of tbe grain and its right to possession. But on tbe trial it appeared that plaintiff’s claim was predicated entirely upon a chattel mortgage executed and delivered by one Jarvis to it, in wbicb there was an error of description, an error wbicb was not discovered until a few days before tbe trial in question. Jarvis and tbe defendant, Mrs. Hendrickson, were copartners in two or three kinds of business,…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. Bird Island Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Lee County Savings Bank v. Snodgrass Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Harvey v. LidvallOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Helgeson v. Farmers Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Danielson v. ReichertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917