Aker v. Smith

WADDILL, Commissioner.

The jury awarded Mrs. Mae Aker damages in the sum of $1,000 in her suit against appellees. From a judgment accordingly entered she has prosecuted this appeal, urging a reversal because: (1) The damages allowed were inadequate; (2) incompetent evidence was introduced over her objections; and (3) erroneous and prejudicial instructions were given the jury.

Appellant was injured when the vehicle in which she was riding as a passenger came into collision with a car owned and operated by the appellees. She brought this action against appellees seeking damages in the sum of…