First National Bank of Fort Dodge v. O'Connell
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Webster District Court. — Hon. S. M.. Weaver, Judge. Action on a promissory note. From a judgment, for the defendants, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGtranger, J.
On the twenty-fourth of July, 1880,. the firm of O’Connell & Springer made to the plaintiff bank its note for eight hundred seventy-five dollars, due thirty days after date, and the action is to-recover thereon. As a defense to the action it is-averred in the answer that the defendant Springer-delivered to the plaintiff, as collateral to the note in suit, certain tax-sale certificates of the value of three-hundred dollars, and that some two hundred and fifty-dollars was paid to the county auditor in redemption, which the plaintiff neglected to take and apply on the note. Also that certain…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lawrence v. McCalmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Lamberton v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Marschuetz v. WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Goodloe v. ClayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1845
- Nelson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Northwestern Port Huron Co. v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Hawley Bros. Hardware Co. v. BrownstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Hanson v. SkogmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Blanding v. WilseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
- Leonard v. SehmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.