Legal Opinion

Cassella Color Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1913No. 948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7369 (T. D. 32559).

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, Presiding Judge

The merchandise in question in this case, known as hydron blue G and hydron blue B,, consists of dyes, one being a blue with a *114greenish tinge and the other a blue with a reddish tinge. Duty was assessed at 30 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 15 of the tariff act of 1909 as “coal-tar dyes or colors not specially provided for in this section.” They are claimed to be free of duty under paragraph 487 as dyes derived from anthracin.

The comprehensive finding- of facts by the board, which is fully supported by the evidence, we state in the language employed by the board as follows:(1) The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re ParkDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1900
  2. Roessler & Hasslacher Chemical Co. W. J. Matheson & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1891

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  2. Esso Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API