Legal Opinion

James L. Coody v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 2, 1979No. 77-2096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE COURT:

This case having been considered on briefs by the court en banc pursuant to the order entered on June 19,1978, 576 F.2d 106 (5 Cir. 1978), it is ORDERED that the en banc Court convened to consider this case is hereby DISSOLVED and the cause is remanded to the panel.

Before THORNBERRY, RONEY and RUBIN, Circuit Judges.

2Per curiam

We have reconsidered our decision in light of the court’s en banc opinion in Keel v. United States, 5 Cir. 1978, 585 F.2d 110, 113. Although plaintiff established that the trial court failed to comply literally with the requirements of Rule 11, no prejudice resulted…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lee Jackson Keel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. United States v. Felipe Molina-UribeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Juan Manuel Reyes-RuizCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Ralph Edward Phillips v. A.I. Murphy and Michael TurpenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API