Legal Opinion

Raynor v. Raynor

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 8, 2009PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*837The parties to the instant matrimonial action had been married for nearly 40 years and have three emancipated children. Throughout the marriage, the now 65-year-old defendant was the primary wage earner with annual income of approximately $113,000 by the time the action was commenced. On the other hand, except for a relatively brief period during the marriage, the 62-year-old plaintiff was not employed outside the home, was a homemaker, and did not have a college degree. Upon the defendant’s retirement from full-time employment, he expects to receive the sums of approximately $2,300 a month…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. DeCabrera v. Cabrera-RoseteNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Strang v. StrangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Maher v. MaherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Solomon v. SolomonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  5. Grasso v. GrassoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Aloi v. SimoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Chesner v. ChesnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. Khan v. AhmedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Chaudry v. ChaudryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Guzzo v. GuzzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API