Legal Opinion
Berzins v. Berzins
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 27, 2010No. AC 30946PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
In this postjudgment marital dissolution action, the substitute defendant, Daniel King, administrator of the estate of David Berzins (administrator), appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the motion filed by the plaintiff, Mary Berzins, for sanctions and attorney’s fees. On appeal, the administrator claims that the court (1) lacked subject matter jurisdiction and (2) improperly granted the plaintiffs motion for sanctions and attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following relevant facts and procedural history. On…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Maguire v. MaguireSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ramin v. RaminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyd's & Companies CollectiveConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Maris v. McGrathSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Przekopski v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Berzins v. BerzinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Ferraiolo v. FerraioloConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
- Przekopski v. Zoning Bd. of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011