Legal Opinion

Freund v. Kaufer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1931PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

This case involves the ascertainment of the testator’s intention. There is, of course, no rule of law which prohibits a testator from leaving property to illegiti-mates. The precise question is whether or not a devise to a child or children should be construed as describing illegitimate as well as legitimate children. While there is some conflict on this point, the overwhelming weight of authority is to the effect that “child or children” means prima facie legitimate children. Note 23 L. R. A. p. 754; note 27 Harvard Law Review, p. 691; note 2 A. L. R. p. 972.

In Will of Scholl, 100 Wis. 650,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Will of SchollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Will of Tousey v. TouseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. In Re Trust of ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Estate of BohnsackWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Yancey v. First National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API