Legal Opinion

City of Billings Ex Rel. Huertas v. Billings Municipal Court

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2017No. DA 17-0084PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION AND ORDER

2Opinion of the Court · McKINNONJustice McKINNON

¶1 Petitioner James Joseph Huertas (Huertas) requests this Court exercise supervisory control over the Billings Municipal Court and conclude the Municipal Court placed Huertas in double jeopardy when it granted the City’s motion for a mistrial and subsequently scheduled a new trial.

¶2 Montana Constitution, Article VII, Section 2(2), grants this Court general supervisory control over all other courts. This Court exercises supervisory control on a case-by-case basis, as it is an extreme remedy. M. R. App. P. 14(3). Supervisory control is appropriate “when urgency or emergency…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. PartinMontana Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. D. BurtonMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. RobertsMontana Supreme Court · 2025
  3. State v. M. Newrobe, Sr.Montana Supreme Court · 2021
  4. D. Lacey v. 13th Jud. DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State v. D. FosterMontana Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API