Legal Opinion

Sturdivant v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1932No. 5 Div. 873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

This appellant was indicted, tried, and convicted for making a false entry on the books and accounts of the Sturdivant Bank, at Dadeville, Ala., in violation of section 3409, Code 1923, which reads as follows: “Any individual banker or director, officer, agent or employee of an incorporated bank or individual banker, who wilfully and intentionally makes or concurs in making any false entry, or wilfully and intentionally concurs in omitting to make any material entry on its books and accounts, shall be guilty of a felony, and on conviction must be sen- fenced to the penitentiary for not less…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller-Brent Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Cannon v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Southworth v. SheaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. Manning v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Grimes v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Riley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Handley v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API