State v. Dyer
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
The defendants were tried for murder and convicted of manslaughter. Their appeal presents 36 bills of exception, the greater of which are purely frivolous, 'consisting of bills to rulings on evidence, to wit, alleged relevant testimony excluded or irrelevant testimony admitted. But these bills do not show how or why the testimony was relevant or irrelevant, as they refer only to isolated questions, with*381out the slightest indication of the connection in which they were asked. Indeed, many of the questions were not even answered, and there is not the least indication how the answers given to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SandifordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1913
- State v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
- Lee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- State v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- State v. WidemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.