Legal Opinion

106 LTD., David Palmlund, Tax Matters Partner v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided January 10, 2011No. Docket 14586-05Unknown

1Opinion of the Court

Holmes, Judge:

David Palmlund bought into a bad deal to lose money but save on taxes. He has since filed an amended return and paid the tax he was trying to avoid. But he contests the penalty that the Commissioner asserts against him; he argues that he relied in good faith on professional advisers.

FINDINGS OF FACT

I. Palmlund

David Palmlund started his professional life in upstate New York. In 1964 he graduated with a dual degree in industrial engineering and management accounting from Syracuse University, then took a job in Rochester with Eastman Kodak as a cost engineer. After a year in the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Neonatology Assocs., P.A. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  3. Leo Goldman and Pauline Goldman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Kligfeld Holdings v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2007
  5. Frank C. Pasternak Judith Pasternak (92-1681/1682) Anthony J. Cutaia Diane Cutaia David G. Koehlinger (92-1681) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API