Legal Opinion
Sproul v. Rob & Charlies, Inc.
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2012No. Docket No. 31,167PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VANZI, Judge.
This case arises from an indemnification claim brought by Third-Party Plaintiff Rob and Charlies, Inc. (R&C), a bicycle retailer doing business in New Mexico, against Third-Party Defendant Joy Industrial Co., Ltd. (Joy Co.), a foreign manufacturer of bicycle parts. R&C appeals a judgment of the district court granting Joy Co.’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court concluded that Joy Co. lacked the constitutionally required minimum contacts with New Mexico necessary to support personal jurisdiction and that, even if the necessary minimum…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fabara v. Gofit, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- Navarrette Rodriguez v. Ford Motor Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2018
- State Ex Rel. New Mexico Office of the Attorney General v. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Gallegos v. FrezzaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State ex rel. Att'y Gen. v. Grand River Enters. Six Nations, Ltd.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.