Legal Opinion

Gage v. Maryatt

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Third Judicial District, Gallatin County. The judgment was rendered by Liddell, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, C. J.

This action was commenced in the Justice’s Court of Gallatin County by Gage, to recover from Maryatt the sum of fifteen dollars, and for the return of a bull, or eighty-five dollars, its value. These matters are stated in the summons, and also the following notification : “ That if you fail to appear and answer said complaint, as above required, the said plaintiff will take a judgment by default against you for the sum of one hundred dollars, if a delivery cannot be had, and costs of suit.” The summons was served personally upon Maryatt, who did not appear, and his default was entered.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Jones v. Cty. Court of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Martin v. District Court of the First DistrictNevada Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Rickey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Blackwood v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Barnum v. FitzpatrickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gravelin v. PorierMontana Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Gulf Pipe Line Co. v. VanderbergSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Hinderager v. MacGinnissMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Allen v. BohnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Davis v. Bell Boy Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API