Legal Opinion

State v. Coats

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1980No. 7912SC1199PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

In his first assignment of error defendant offers two arguments to support his contention that the trial court erred in refusing to submit the issue of common law robbery to the jury. Defendant first points to his own testimony when he was asked on direct examination, “Did you ever see any gun — did you see Hoot with any gun?” Defendant answered, “No, sir.” Counsel asked, “You didn’t see the gun?” Defendant answered, “It was dark in the car anyway.” On cross-examination defendant was asked, “You say you never saw a gun?” He answered, “I didn’t.” The prosecutor then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. State v. GurkinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rowell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. CarverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API