Todd v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries. The plaintiff alone testified as to liability. Evidence as to his injuries was given by several of his relatives as well as by himself. The presiding judge* of the Superior Court gave instructions, to which no exception was taken, as to due care and negligence. In the part of the charge touching *506damages he said, “You will notice in all of these cases that, when the testimony comes from the family of the plaintiff, the plaintiff was the most perfect specimen of manhood, imaginary, before the accident, and is the most…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maguire v. Middlesex RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Beal v. Lowell & Dracut Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Eldridge v. HawleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Rudberg v. Bowden Felting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
3Cited by11 opinions
- Allen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Thompson v. Globe Newspaper Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Runels v. Lowell Sun Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Hunt v. Boston Terminal Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
- Bennett v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.