Legal Opinion

Filippo Candela and Providenza Candela v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 4, 1980No. 80-1077PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge.

This appeal presents two issues: whether the taxpayers successfully overcame the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of a tax deficiency; and whether the Commissioner established, by clear and convincing evidence, that these deficiencies were the result of fraud. The plaintiffs-taxpayers have the burden of proof on the first issue, the Commissioner on the latter. The District Court, after a bench trial, concluded that the taxpayers had failed to rebut the deficiency determinations, and that the deficiencies were the product of fraud.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harry and Eugenia Gromacki v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases). Harry Gromacki v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  2. United States v. Nathan SteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  3. Estate of Hutchen Upshaw, Deceased, Ardenia Upshaw, Administratrix, and Ardenia Upshaw, Individually v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Estate of Hutchen Upshaw, Deceased, Ardenia Upshaw, Administratrix,petitioner-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Williamson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
  2. William S. Spitz and Barbara A. Spitz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Boggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  4. Phillips v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  5. Lerch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API