Filippo Candela and Providenza Candela v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge.
This appeal presents two issues: whether the taxpayers successfully overcame the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s determination of a tax deficiency; and whether the Commissioner established, by clear and convincing evidence, that these deficiencies were the result of fraud. The plaintiffs-taxpayers have the burden of proof on the first issue, the Commissioner on the latter. The District Court, after a bench trial, concluded that the taxpayers had failed to rebut the deficiency determinations, and that the deficiencies were the product of fraud.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harry and Eugenia Gromacki v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases). Harry Gromacki v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Nathan SteinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Estate of Hutchen Upshaw, Deceased, Ardenia Upshaw, Administratrix, and Ardenia Upshaw, Individually v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Estate of Hutchen Upshaw, Deceased, Ardenia Upshaw, Administratrix,petitioner-Appellant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
3Cited by42 opinions
- Williamson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- William S. Spitz and Barbara A. Spitz v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Boggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
- Phillips v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1984
- Lerch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1987
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.