Legal Opinion

Pyle v. Harmar Township Zoning Hearing Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1065 C.D. 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

This is an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which in an opinion dated July 22,1974 dismissed Frank N. Pyle’s appeal from a decision of the Zoning Hearing Board (board) of Harmar Township (Township).

*6On November 14, 1973 Mr. Pyle, the owner of a 64.96 acre tract in the Township, submitted to the board a challenge to the validity of the Township zoning ordinance under Sections 910 and 1004 of the Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Act of July 31, 1968, P.L. 805, as amended, 53 P.S. §§10910 and 11004. On March 4, 1974 the board after holding a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Beaver Gasoline Co. v. Osborne BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Eller v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Camp Hill Development Co. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Colonial Park for Mobile Homes, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lower Allen Citizens Action Group, Inc. v. Lower Allen Township Zoning Hearing Board & Hempt Bros.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Overstreet v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Open Pantry Food Marts v. Commonwealth ex rel. Township of HempfieldCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. In re Appeal of Hume VillageCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Fincher v. Township of MiddlesexCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API