Legal Opinion

People v. Morris

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 16, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Approximately 4 Vi hours after being advised of and having waiving his Miranda rights for the second time, the defendant gave a written statement in which he confessed to the shooting in question. During that time, the defendant was in continuous police custody, and a review of the record reveals no evidence of coercion by the authorities or that the state*552ment was not voluntarily made. Accordingly, that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress the inculpatory statement was properly denied (see, People v Martinez, 115 AD2d 664; People v Glinsman, 107 AD2d 710, lv denied 64 NY2d 889,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. GlinsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Papa v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. People v. BostickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. VasquezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. ChimelisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API