Niewiadomski v. Dower
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, we conclude that Family Court properly denied the petition of Robert Niewiadomski seeking reimbursement for child support overpayments. There is a “strong public policy against restitution or recoupment of support overpayments” (Baraby v Baraby, 250 AD2d 201, 205). Although “recoupment of child support payments is, under certain circumstances, permissible” (Hamza v Hamza, 268 AD2d 459; see, Tuchrello v Tuchrello, 233 AD2d 917, 918), we see no basis to disturb the court’s denial of the motion herein.
In appeal No. 2, we…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baraby v. BarabyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Tuchrello v. TuchrelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Hamza v. HamzaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by4 opinions
- People ex rel. Breitstein v. AaronsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Annette M.R. v. John W.R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bartholomay v. BartholomayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Dower v. NiewiadomskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001