Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Temple

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 12, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, from the Circuit Court of Peoria County; the Hon. Leslie D. Poterbauch, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Higbee

This is an action of assumpsit, by appellees against the former firm of Wiley & Drake, of which appellant was a member.

On January 13, 1897, while the partnership still existed, the firm of Wiley & Drake executed to appellees their five promissory notes for $175 each, falling due respectively on the 10th days of May, June, July, August and September, 1897. Shortly after giving the notices the firm of Wiley & Drake dissolved partnership, appellant disposing of his interest in the firm to his partner, who took all the firm' assets and assumed all its liabilities. Two of the notes were paid, but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Warner v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Conwell v. McCowanIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Warner v. CraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Chandler v. HigginsIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flanagan v. Madison Square State BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API