Legal Opinion

Leventhal v. Moseley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1995No. S94G0774PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to determine whether a direct appeal, as opposed to a discretionary appeal, lies from the denial of a motion to set aside predicated on the failure of the trial court to notify the losing party of its decision.

Plaintiffs sued defendant on four promissory notes (totalling over $500,000) and the trial court granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Two months later, defendant moved for permission to file an out-of-time appeal, or, alternatively, to set aside the judgment, alleging neither he nor his attorney received a copy of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cambron v. Canal InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Crawford v. Kroger CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pierce v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Downs v. C.D.C. Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  3. Sea Tow/Sea Spill v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. Moseley v. Interfinancial Management Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Case v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API