Legal Opinion

Butler v. Ellerbe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 6, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

This was an original application to this court for injunction, M. C. Butler being the petitioner, and W. H. Ellerbe, comptroller general, and W. T. C. Bates, State treasurer, being the respondents.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This action was instituted in this court, in its original jurisdiction, for an injunction against the defendants, as State officers, to restrain them from applying the public *258funds in the State treasury to the payment of certain appropriations made by the legislature, which, it is claimed, are illegal. The appropriations alleged to be illegal are those made in the appropriation act of 1893 for the pay of supervisors of registration, and for the pay of commissioners, managers, and messengers of elections for the fiscal year commencing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. In Re AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  5. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Scroggie v. Scarborough, State TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. State Ex Rel. Rawlinson v. AnselSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  5. Mullen v. DwightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API