Legal Opinion

Callens v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 20, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Rose, J. Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged with, and ultimately found guilty of, violating the prison disciplinary rule against urging others to participate in a work stoppage. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding contending that the determination, based primarily on confidential information, is not supported by substantial evidence. We agree.

It is well…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daise v. GiambrunoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Holmes v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Milland v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Christian v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Debose v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Colon v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Stone v. BezioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. People ex rel. Santiago v. Warden, Rikers Island Correctional FacilityNew York Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API