Faulkner v. Hook
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtJames T. Bdair, J.
— Faulkner, Slatten aiid • Wendling sued separately to enjoin respondents from trespassing on their respective lands. The trial court rendered judgment against each of them, and these three appeals followed. The cases have been re-assigned. They will be consider ed as- one.
Appellants do not state the facts in detail, and that example will be followed. The evidence is quite conflicting. When the record is considered and due deference is..given the findings necessarily implicated in the decree, the facts"appear to be with respondents. In 1869 or 1870 certain residents of Daviess County…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Welsh v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Rogerson v. ShepherdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Barber v. BaileySupreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- Smith v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Ball v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Jacobs v. BrewsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
- Bridle Trail Association v. O'SHANICKMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
- Chapman v. SchearfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Concerned Citizens of Brunswick County Taxpayers Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Fassold v. SchamburgSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.