Robinson v. Seales

In our original opinion we said:

“There is no specific finding of the court that Elmer was or was not the child of Nathan Nash; but there are, however, findings of such circumstances relative to this question, when coupled with the judgment rendered, that would, in the absence of a statement of facts, justify the conclusion that the court did find that Elmer was the child ,of Nathan Nash.” 242 S. W. 754.

Following this statement we set out the circumstances referred to.

It was made clear by our opinion that if Elmer was not the child of Nathan Nash, ' then at his death his surviving wife,…