Ne-ha-sa-ne Park Ass'n v. Lloyd
New York Supreme Court
This action is brought for the purpose of obtaining a cancellation of two tax deeds held by the defendant, which the plaintiff claims are void and clouds upon his title.
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The land in question consists of about 2,550 acres, situated in the Adirondack forest, and is -that part of Township 41 of Totten and Crossfield’s purchase, which lies in Herkimer county. It all lies in the northwest quarter of said township, except about five acres, which lies in the southwest quarter thereof. The tract is in a triangular form.
The defendant contests the validity of the plaintiff’s title and insists upon the validity of his own. The plaintiff claims under four separate sources of title, called respectively, the Benedict title, the Mead title, the Macomb patent and the Shaw…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dutch Church in Garden-Street v. MottNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Peck v. . GoodberlettNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Ne-ha-sa-ne Park Ass'n v. LloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. ScandoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Renzi v. SpiritoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929